Legal Opinion

State v. Sowell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1988No. 86-1499PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

We are confronted today by issues concerning the convictions and death sentence of appellant. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals and uphold the sentence of death.

I

In his first proposition of law, appellant contends that his death sentence must be set aside because the court of appeals refused to consider his voluntary intoxication at the time of the offense to be a mitigating factor.

The trial court considered appellant’s intoxication and drug use as factors relevant to the issue of whether appellant should receive the death sentence, but gave these…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. RicheySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. HillOhio Supreme Court · 1996

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API