Legal Opinion

Foremost Insurance v. Weetman

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-177PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McCUNE, Senior District Judge.

In this declaratory judgment action, we consider motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs Foremost Insurance Company, (Foremost), and one of the defendants, Donegal Insurance Company (Done-gal). Foremost and Donegal seek a declaration that they are not responsible to pay any damages resulting from a state court action against their insured. Because we construe the insurance policies in question in favor of both insurance companies, the summary judgment motions will be granted.

Factual Background

Defendants, Vincent B. Platek and Janice…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. ElitzkySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. MacKinnon v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. Zordan v. PageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Whitt v. DeLeuDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Providence Mutual Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  3. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Horace Mann Insurance v. ForeDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1992
  5. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. PurdySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API