Providence Mutual Fire Insurance v. Scanlon
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The plaintiff, Providence Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Providence Mutual), appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Groff, J.) finding coverage under a homeowner’s policy for a claim against the insured, Jeffrey Scanlon, for shooting James Haines in the eye with a- BB gun. On appeal, Providence Mutual argues that coverage should be excluded under two separate policy provisions, and that the trial court should not have awarded attorney’s fees to Haines’ mother, Ronda. We hold that coverage exists but that the award of attorney’s fees was improper, and therefore affirm in part and reverse…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Brannigan v. UsitaloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- MacKinnon v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Jespersen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Richard A. Mottolo and Service Pumping & Drain Co., Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WertzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Matarese v. New Hampshire Municipal Ass'n Property-Liability Insurance Trust, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. DahoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- EnergyNorth Natural Gas, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.