Legal Opinion
Horace Mann Insurance v. Fore
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided January 29, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-C-985-NPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN L. CARROLL, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. FACTS
The plaintiff, Horace Mann Insurance Company, has moved this court for a declaratory judgment as to the scope of its duty to indemnify or defend its insured, Cecil Fore, and for summary judgment. The motion for summary judgment was filed November 6, 1991. On November 15, 1991, Judge Hobbs ordered that a response be made on or before December 4, 1991, and informed the parties that as of December 4, 1991 the motion would be deemed submitted by the court. 1 The defendants have filed no response.
The defendants in this case…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Worcester Insurance v. Fells Acres Day School, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Gearing v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- B.B. v. Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Commercial Union Insurance Companies v. Sky, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.