Legal Opinion

Grant v. Ten Hope

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1921No. 16458PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered July 15, 1920, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Respondent, a real estate broker, procured the defendants Ten Hope and wife, as parties of the first part, and the defendant Guy Syford, as party of the second part, to enter into a written con*532tract for the exchange of real estate, dated January 3, 1914, which, among other things, provides:

“Whereas, the parties of the first part, and the party of the second part are desirous of making an exchange of real estate, the parties of the first part in consideration of one dollar ($1.00) paid by the party of the second part, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, agrees to sell to the party of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Muir v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Henneberg v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sams v. Olympia Holding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. White v. Panama Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Godefroy v. ReillyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Richey v. BoltonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Palmer v. Stanwood Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API