Legal Opinion
Byam v. Inter-State Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 10, 1933No. 29,646PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission awarding respondent compensation for an accidental injury.
The facts involved are not in dispute. Respondent since 1910 has been in the employ of relator as chauffeur. As such it was his duty to drive relator’s automobile both in its business, and also for the personal use of Mark Elliott, one of its officers, and for his wife. On July 11, 1932, respondent was directed by Mr. Elliott to go to relator’s mine and get a Hudson car, do some driving for his wife in Virginia, and then drive to Duluth for some furniture to be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Kayser v. Van NestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Geiss v. Twin City Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Gacesa v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Rautio v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- M & K Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
- Ginther v. J. P. Graham Transfer Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. SwortSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. SwortSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957