Legal Opinion

Gacesa v. Consumers Power Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1922No. Docket No. 67PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, C. J.

Defendant in June, 1921, was doing certain construction work at its plant in Battle Creek. Plaintiff’s husband, a painter, was in its employ. He met with an accident on June 17th, resulting in his death, for which compensation was awarded plaintiff. A detailed statement of the facts will be presently made. The foreman of defendant, Mr. Howard, was called by plaintiff as a witness and interrogated as to the employment of deceased, his wage, and the circumstances of his death. Upon cross-examination of this witness, over objection of plaintiff’s counsel, defendant was permitted to put ■into the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Rayner v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Fournier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  3. Borin's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Fox v. Barrett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Sichterman v. Kent Storage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Baalmann, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Enfield v. the Certain-Teed Prod. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Villaronga v. Tribunal de Distrito de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  4. Bishop v. ShurlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hamilton v. Swigart Coal MineWyoming Supreme Court · 1943

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API