Legal Opinion

Rautio v. International Harvester Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 23, 1930No. 27,858PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission awarding compensation.

Gust Eautio, the deceased employe, and Andrew Maki were relator’s employes in the Bruce mine at Chisholm. They were contract miners. They worked together and were paid upon the basis of the quantity of ore mined. Each earned from $5.60 to $6.07 daily. On March 13, 1929, and for a long time prior thereto they worked in contract No. 40 located underground and at the extreme northerly end of the mine. Shortly before noon on that day these two men observed in contract No. 40 the beginning of a cavein.' They saw that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Fournier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
  3. Maher v. Duluth Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Walcofski v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Hibberd v. HugheyNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Baalmann, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Vesel v. Jardine Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Oslin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Tucker v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API