Legal Opinion

Mole v. New York, Ontario & Western Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1907PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion to" change the place of trial.

1Opinion of the CourtMorschauser, J.

This motion is made by the defendant to change the place of trial upon the ground of convenience of witnesses and that the county designated, viz., Orange county, is not the proper county, and that the same should *23be changed to Oneida comity, the comity wherein plaintiff was injured.

Plaintiff sustained the injuries at South Loop, Oneida county, this State, while he was employed by defendant upon a work train on defendant’s railroad. The negligence and injuries are denied by the defendant.

In the affidavit stating the names of the witnesses who will be convenienced by a change of the place of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lyman v. Gramercy ClubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Poland v. United Traction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Tuthill v. Long Island RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Adriance, Platt & Co. v. CoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Bushnell v. DurantNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rowe v. Charles H. Ditson Co.New York Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API