Legal Opinion

Bushnell v. Durant

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Cornelius S. Bushnell against William W. Durant. From an order changing place oí trial from the county of New York to the county of Hamilton, plaintiff appeals.

1Per curiam

The action is brought to procure a judgment directing a reassignment of certain interests in a bond and two mortgages made by the Adirondacks Company to one Enoch H. Rosekrans, and secured by certain lands situated in the counties of Hamilton, Franklin, Saratoga, Essex, Herkimer, St. Lawrence, Jefferson, and others, in the state of New York, which interests, plaintiff alleges, were conveyed for a grossly inadequate price, because of certain fraudulent representations made by the defendant as to the value of the lands upon which the mortgages were a lien. The answer of the defendant is a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thurfjell v. WitherbeeNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Security Investment Co. v. GiffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Van Alstine v. BurtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  3. Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Adriance, Platt & Co. v. CoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API