Rowe v. Charles H. Ditson Co.
New York Supreme Court
Action by Mildred Rowe against the Charles EL Ditson Company. On motion to change the place of trial. Motion denied.
1Opinion of the CourtKiley, J.
This is a motion to change the place of trial of the above-entitled action from Tompkins county to New York county, or some county adjoining thereto. The motion is made under section 987 of the Code of Civil Procedure; the particular ground being the convenience of witnesses, and that the ends of justice will be promoted by the change.
The plaintiff in her complaint alleges that she negotiated with the defendant for the purchase of a harp, and that in consideration of said purchase, and of other covenants and agreements, the defendant undertook to teach her the art of playing the harp, and did…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tuthill v. Long Island RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Mole v. New York, Ontario & Western RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rowe v. Charles H. Ditson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913