Legal Opinion

Adriance, Platt & Co. v. Coon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Aaron Coon, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Dutchess Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Dutchess on the 8th day of December, 1896, denying his motion to change the place of trial of the action from the county of Dutchess to the county of Cattaraugus.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

The action is brought to recover the purchase price of a certain machine used for reaping grain, and called a “ binder and bundle carrier.” The complaint alleged that the contract of sale was in writing; that plaintiff had fulfilled the contract upon its part, and that the defendant had made default in payment in accordance with the terms of the contract, for which judgment was demanded with interest. The defendant answered by a denial, putting in issue the execution of the contract, and further answered by averment that plaintiff’s agent offered to sell the said machine to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bushnell v. DurantNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hausmann v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Smith v. MackNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Van Alstine v. BurtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Mole v. New York, Ontario & Western RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Dubeshter v. OkunAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API