Legal Opinion

Fahrenwald v. Hemphill

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1965PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

This began as a suit by a guardian to require an accounting. A fourth amended complaint prayed for cancellation of a lease. Under the terms of the lease the defendant operated a livestock ranch which was owned by the plaintiff’s ward. Although the trial court refused to terminate the lease, it granted an accounting. Both parties appeal.

The record, which consists of approximately 1200 pages of typewritten material, reveals that Peter Schmidt was a successful wheat and cattle rancher, and that L. E. Hemphill was a friend and business associate. In 1953, -under a written agreement, Schmidt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cays v. McDANIELOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. KerronOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Carpenter v. KraningerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Fahrenwald v. WachterOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Orsen Et Ux. v. SiegleOregon Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Green v. Uncle Don's Mobile CityOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. McBrideOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bernard v. Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. Transamerica Insurance v. BloomfieldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Barkins v. Stuyvesant InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API