Legal Opinion

Fahrenwald v. Wachter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is an appeal from an order of the county court of Umatilla county appointing Marguerite M. Fahrenwald guardian of the person and estate of her uncle, P. H. Schmidt, then 71 years of age and alleged to *537be an incompetent person, upon the petition of said guardian.

In this petition it is alleged that P. H. Schmidt “is ill and enfeebled in mind and body; that said P. H. Schmidt, by reason of his old age, disease and his enfeebled and weakened mental and physical condition, is unable and incapable of managing his property and by reason thereof, said P. H. Schmidt is an incompetent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship of CoburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. MacDonald v. La Salle National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. In re NorthcuttOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Kutzner v. MeyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fahrenwald v. HemphillOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Loss v. LossIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Whitteberry v. WhitteberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. State Of Washington, V. Antwaun Deshawn PinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. State Of Washington, V. Antwaun Deshawn PinesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API