Legal Opinion

Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Kerron

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1928PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

1-3. The law of this case is well settled. When an injured party has capacity to read a written contract signed by him and has an opportunity to do so, if no fraud is practiced upon him to prevent him from reading such writing, and he chooses to rely upon what another says it contains without requesting that it be read, he is estopped by his own negligence from claiming that he is not bound by its terms: Lovell v. Potts, 112 Or. 538 (207 Pac. 1006, 226 Pac. 1111), and cases there cited. On the other hand, if false representations are made and relied on by another, or undue influence is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schreyer v. Turner Flouring Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wheelwright v. VanderbiltOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. McCabe v. KelleherOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Whitney v. BissellOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Grover v. Hawthorne EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Karsun v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Phillips v. Colfax Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. West v. PraterIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API