Legal Opinion

Burrell v. City University of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 26, 1998No. 94 CIV. 8711(RWS)PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

In this sexual discrimination action, defendants City University of New York (“CUNY”) and Dr. Stanford A. Roman, Jr., M.D. (“Roman”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 and Fed. R. Civ. 12(c) for dismissal of all counts in the third amended complaint (“Third Amended Complaint”) of plaintiff Cherie Burrell (“Burrell”). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

Parties

Burrell was born in Barbados and, at all times relevant to this action, was a resident of Laurelton, New York.

CUNY is a…

2Cases cited94 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dove v. Fordham UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. William Pikulin and Savely Petreykov v. The City University of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Emmons v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  4. Ponticelli v. Zurich American Insurance GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Cowan v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API