Legal Opinion

Ponticelli v. Zurich American Insurance Group

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 3, 1998No. 96 Civ. 9095 (RWS)PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

In this action alleging discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), and the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 296 (the “HRL”), defendants Zurich Insurance Company (“Zurich”) — sued as “Zurich American Insurance Group” and Zurich American Insurance Company” — Evan Callas (“Callas”), Charles Herbert (“Herbert”), and Robert Fishman (“Fishman”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56,…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Risco v. McHughDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Saenger v. Montefiore Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  4. DeWitt v. LiebermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  5. Cowan v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API