Legal Opinion
Smith v. Continental Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided February 26, 1971PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPuryear, J.
The complainants Lowell T. Smith and Travis U. Browning, partners, d/b/a Smith-Browning Motors, filed their original bill against the defendants on November 12, 1969, alleging that they are engaged in the operation of an automobile agency, which had been operated by them since January 1, 1968, on which latter mentioned date the defendant, Continental Insurance Company, issued an endorsement insuring complainants against certain hazards pursuant to an original policy previously issued by said Continental Insurance Company to complainants ’ predecessors in business.
The bill further alleges that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schomer v. Hekla Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. McTyierTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
- Henry v. Southern Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
- Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
- Life & Casualty Insurance v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bill Brown Construction Co. v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Diana Lynn TARRANT Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Nelms v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
- Dallas Glass of Hendersonville, Inc. v. Bituminous Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- United Pacific Insurance v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.