Legal Opinion

Bill Brown Construction Co. v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1991PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

The plaintiff appeals from a Court of Appeals judgment holding that a cargo insurance policy did not provide coverage for plaintiff’s cargo loss, because the policy was unambiguous and because the principles of waiver and estoppel cannot be used to broaden the coverage so as to protect the insured against perils not insured against in the policy. We disagree with the Court of Appeals and therefore reverse.

FACTS

The plaintiff, Bill Brown Construction Company, Inc., d/b/a Bill Brown Trucking, specializes in the transportation of large cargos which, due to their length,…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Gould Morris Electric Co. v. Atlantic Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Tate v. Charles Aguillard Ins. & Real Est.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Wolverine Insurance v. Jack Jordan, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  5. The Travelers Indemnity Company v. B. N. Holman, Mary Alice CoombsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Kristen Cox MORRISON v. Paul ALLEN Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Leonard Gamble v. Sputniks, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Gaston v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2003

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API