State v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
One accused of a crime has the right to present all admissible evidence in his/her defense. Generally evidence is admissible if it is relevant. And evidence is relevant if it has “any tendency to make the existence of any fact ... of consequence . . . more ... or less probable[.]” ER 401; State v. Clark, 78 Wn. App. 471, 477, 898 P.2d 854 (1995). In this third degree rape prosecution, Thomas Harris tried to introduce evidence that the fetus being carried by the obviously pregnant prosecuting witness was not his. The court refused the offer, concluding that it would violate the rape shield…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. HudlowWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. LoughWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Fenimore v. Donald M. Drake Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. DemosWashington Supreme Court · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. PoseyWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. KinardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. TroutCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.