Legal Opinion

State v. Trout

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 25, 2005No. 21633-1-IIIPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

105 P.3d 69 (2005)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Adam Larson TROUT, Appellant.

No. 21633-1-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.

January 25, 2005.

Carl E. Hueber, Winston & Cashatt Lawyers, Spokane, WA, William D. McCool, Attorney at Law, Walla Walla, WA, for Appellant.

Scott W. Johnson, Benton County Prosecutor's Office, Kennewick, WA, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, A.C.J.

This appeal follows a jury's finding of guilty for two counts of first degree robbery and one count of second degree assault. Adam Trout challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support accomplice…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BorsheimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  2. State v. BorsheimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. State v. LeydaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. LeydaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. TruongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API