Dunn v. City of Milwaukie
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
The City of Milwaukie (the city) used highly pressurized water to clean the sewer lines adjacent to plaintiffs house, causing sewage to back up through toilets and bathroom fixtures. Plaintiff brought this action against the city seeking compensation for the damage to her home on two theories — negligence and inverse condemnation. The trial court dismissed the negligence claim before trial as barred by the statute of limitations. See ORS 30.275 (requiring notice of tort claim against public body to be given within 180 days of injury). The inverse condemnation claim went to trial before a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- City of Dallas v. JenningsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Yes on 24-367 Committee v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Dunn v. City of MilwaukieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Alderwoods (Oregon), Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Hall v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Farris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.