Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Jennings

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2004No. 01-1012PublishedCited by 233 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schneider

James and Charlotte Jennings sued the City of Dallas after the City’s sewer main backed up and flooded their home with raw sewage. They alleged two claims: unconstitutional taking and nuisance. Specifically, their pleadings asserted that the City’s maintenance of the sewer line “constituted an unconstitutional taking, damaging, or destruction of plaintiffs’ property for public use without adequate compensation” and that “the pipeline created, operated, and maintained by the City of Dallas constituted a nuisance.”

We first determine whether there is legally sufficient evidence to support the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. City of LaPorte v. BarfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Steele v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by233 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Texas Department of Transportation v. City of Sunset ValleyTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. City of San Antonio v. PollockTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Tarrant Regional Water District v. GraggTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Texas Southern University v. State Street Bank & Trust Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API