McPhaul v. Sewell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
Plaintiffs first assign as error Deputy Commissioner Roney’s rescheduling of the case at the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence. Plaintiffs argue that they were greatly prejudiced by staking out their case and then having Deputy Commissioner Roney keep the suit open for defendants to obtain a medical expert of their choosing. We do not believe the rescheduling of the case constitutes error. The Legislature empowered the Industrial Commission to make rules in so far as they are not inconsistent with the Workmen’s Compensation Act, G.S. 97-80. Rule XVI of the Rules of the Industrial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Blalock v. ROBERTS COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. DeGregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Reeves v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bucktown Partners v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983