Legal Opinion

State v. DeGregory

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1974No. 4PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

At the close of all the evidence defendant moved for judgment of nonsuit in each case. His first assignment of error is based on denial of these motions. He contends the motions should have been allowed with respect to the charges of murder in the first degree because “no evidence was presented during the trial which related to the elements of premeditation and deliberation, either by direct proof or by any other inference or circumstance.”

“Premeditation and deliberation are not usually susceptible of direct proof, and are therefore susceptible of proof by circumstances by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Dale Estin Birdsell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. State v. DuboiseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. ReamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. Van LandinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API