Legal Opinion

Mettet v. City of Yankton

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1946No. File No. 8907PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Following our decision in Danforth v. City of Yankton et al., S. D., 25 N. W.2d 50, the city commission by resolution decided to proceed with the purchase and acquisition of the bridge. The present plaintiff requested and was granted permission to commence this proceeding in this court wherein it is sought to prevent the city from taking any further action with reference to the purchase of the bridge. We refer to the former decision for a statement of facts. Any additional facts necessary to a decision upon any issue will appear under our discussion of such issue.

Does the issuance of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Trimmier v. CarltonTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Chicago Motor Club v. KinneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Danforth v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Schomer v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Boe v. FossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Clem v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. McFarland v. BarronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Harris County Water Control & Improvement District No. 58 v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Meierhenry v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API