Meierhenry v. City of Huron
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Justice.
This is an original proceeding in which the Attorney General, joined by a resident and taxpayer of the city of Huron, and a resident and taxpayer of the city of Rapid City, seeks a declaratory judgment declaring SDCL ch. 11-9 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) unconstitutional and a writ of prohibition restraining the cities of Huron and Rapid City from proceeding with the establishment of tax incremental districts and the issuance of bonds pursuant to the Act. We deny the relief requested. 1
In 1978, the South Dakota Legislature authorized municipalities to create tax…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- State v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. Miami Beach Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Florida · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Kanaly v. State by and Through JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1986 Pa 281Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Accounts Management, Inc. v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Haugland v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.