Legal Opinion

State v. Mixon

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 9, 2001No. A01A1428PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

The state appeals the trial court’s suppression of evidence discovered during a warrantless “protective sweep” of the home of defendants Donna and John Roscoe Mixon. A “protective sweep” is a limited search of the house primarily to ensure officer safety by detecting the presence of other occupants. Inglett v. State, 239 Ga. App. 524 (521 SE2d 241) (1999). Following the suppression hearing, the court concluded that the warrantless search was unlawful and granted the motion. We affirm the trial court’s ruling.

The evidence adduced at the suppression hearing demonstrated that on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Inglett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Kirsche v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. State v. PandoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. State v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. State v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API