Legal Opinion

Kirsche v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 21, 2005No. A04A1949PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, Judge.

An officer lawfully in a place who sees evidence relating to a crime in plain view may seize that evidence. In this case, two of three officers investigating a domestic complaint at night went to the back of William Lester Kirsche’s residence as a safety precaution as the third officer knocked on the front door. While in the backyard, one of the officers discovered what appeared to be a large marijuana plant. Based on this evidence, Kirsche was convicted on charges of manufacturing marijuana and possession of marijuana. He now appeals denial of his pre-trial motion to suppress…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. Gilreath v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  5. United States v. Bryan Keith CarterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sherrer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Corey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. State v. PandoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Arp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Snider v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API