State v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Judge.
The State appeals from the grant of appellee’s motion to suppress the cocaine seized from him in a warrantless search. We affirm the trial court’s ruling.
It is well established that in a motion to suppress the trial judge sits as the trier of fact, and that holds true even when there is a conflict in the evidence presented. The credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be accorded their testimony rest with the trier of fact, who is under no obligation to believe a witness, even in the absence of contradictory testimony. The factfinder may accept part of a witness’ testimony…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tarwid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Sultenfuss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- State v. BetsillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Yocham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Bettis v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- State v. AguirreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- State v. MixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.