Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 24, 1921No. 29, OriginalPublishedCited by 13 opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING OF APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney

Petitioner asks a rehearing of this matter and a reconsideration of our decision of June 1, 1921, 256 U. S. 512, by which we refused to award a mandamus requiring the Judge of the District Court to refrain from exercising jurisdiction in the cause of Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. City of Lincoln, et al., after our disposal of the final decree on appeal, for the purpose of requiring restitution to gas consumers of amounts exacted by petitioner pending the suit in excess of the maximum rates permitted by the ordinance that was under attack therein.

We have permitted the petition for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Ex Parte Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. C. L. Merrick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Galveston Electric Co. v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Patterson v. PollockOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Goodwin Preserving Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API