Legal Opinion

Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. C. L. Merrick Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 20, 1920No. 15PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, . OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Devanter

This is a companion case to Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co. v. Washburn Lignite Coal Co., just decided, ante, 370, and was brought by a shipper to recover charges exacted in- excess of the statutory rate. The shipments were made prior to the first judgment in the injunction súit, when the carrier was refusing to give effect to the schedule ;.'n,nd the excess was paid under pro test and because the carrier would not deliver the coal on payment of the statutory rate. In the trial court there was a judgment against the shipper, and this was reversed by the Supreme Court with a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Missouri v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Utley v. St. PetersburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Ex Parte Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Wabash Ry. Co. v. KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. in Re: Thomas Lytle and Ellen Lytle, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API