Ex Parte Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ON PETITION FOB WBIT OF MANDAMUS. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney
Following our decision in Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. City of Lincoln, June 2, 1919, 250 U. S. 256, our mandate went down to the District Court of thte United States for the District of Nebraska, reciting our determination that its decree of September 23, 1915, should be modified as indicated in the opinion, and as so modified should be affirmed with costs; and proceeding as follows: “You, therefore, are hereby commanded that 'such execution and proceedings be had in said cause as according to right and justice, and the. laws of the United States, ought to be had, the said appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Missouri v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Lincoln Gas & Electric Light Co. v. City of LincolnSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
3Cited by21 opinions
- Galveston Electric Co. v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Inland Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Berthold-Jennings Lumber Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.