in the Interest of C.D.E., C.V.E., and S.D.E., Children
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE WALKER, Justice.
I.Introduction
Following a bench trial, the trial court signed an order terminating Appellant Father’s parental rights to his three daughters, C.D.E., C.V.E., and S.D.E. 1 In four issues on appeal, Father argues that the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court’s findings that grounds for termination of his parental rights existed under Texas Family Code section 161.001(1)(D), (E), (L), and (Q). For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm in part and reverse and render in part.
II. Factual and Procedural Background 2
The record…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- in the Interest of J.P.B., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- in the Interest of D.D.G., a Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
- In the Interest of E.T., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2026
- In the Interest of K.J., a Child v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
- Waste Management of Texas, Inc. v. Maria Dodd, Individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Emilio Dodd, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2025
- in the Interest of A.D.C. and J.D.C., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.