Legal Opinion

Kedey v. Petty

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1899No. 18,416PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Prom the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

The special finding discloses that appellant was intermarried with Matthew T. Kedey in 1862, and is still his wife. She had no property at the time of her marriage, except one heifer, two shoats, and one dozen chickens, and has since acquired none by gift, devise, or descent, except one cow, given her by her husband to replace the heifer, which died a few months after the marriage. At the time of the marriage, Matthew T. Kedey had about eighty-six acres of land in Clinton county, upon which they settled, and have continuously resided, raising a family of three children. At no time has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barnett v. HarshbargerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. ClosserIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Campbell v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Palmer v. GloverIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Pierce v. HowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mount v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. City National Bank v. StoeckelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Lowry National Bank v. FickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. National Surety Co. v. State ex rel. HeimannIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State v. KieferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API