Legal Opinion

Lititz Mutual Insurance Co. v. Branch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1977No. 38830PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Defendants appeal from a declaratory judgment entered by the trial court determining that a homeowner’s policy issued by plaintiff insurance company does not obligate plaintiff to defend the Kables in a lawsuit brought by defendants Branch for injuries sustained by Amy Lea Branch when she was bitten by a dog owned by the Kables.

The dog involved was an eight year old male Weimaraner named Baron. On June 16, 1974, Baron bit a neighbor boy, Virgil McCormack, while Baron was tethered near the Kable home. Baron was taken to a veterinary clinic where he remained under observation for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Utilities Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Toole v. Bechtel CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Adele S. Duggan v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. PryseskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Westfield Insurance v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Eyler v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Marshall Schinner v. Michael GundrumWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance v. HerouxSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API