Legal Opinion

Chase v. Angell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1906No. 105PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Cross-appeals from Ingham; Wiest, J. Bill by Charles H. Chase against Horace B. Angelí and Clara E. Angelí for the dissolution of a partnership and for an accounting. From the decree rendered, both parties appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker-, J.

The bill in this cause was filed to obtain the dissolution of a copartnership, and an accounting. Both parties have appealed. The learned circuit judge who heard the cause, heard proofs in open court, upon the subject of the existence of the copartnership, and rendered an interlocutory decree, determining that the relation existed, and referred the cause to a commissioner to take proofs and make a report upon the account. The report being filed, exceptions were taken by both parties, and, upon a final hearing, a decree was made settling the account and directing a sale of the copartnership…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gray v. Palmer & EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Tenney v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  3. Roberts v. McCartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Patterson v. BlakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bagg v. OsbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Cohen v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  3. Worden Grocer Co. v. BlandingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Mosher v. LountArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Bancroft v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API