Legal Opinion

Roberts v. McCarty

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1857PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This was a complaint by Me Carty, Tyner, and Holland, against Roberts, for the partition of certain *17real estate. There was an answer by the defendant, to which the plaintiffs replied.

The facts disclosed by the pleadings and evidence are substantially the following: Stephen and Charles Coffin were the owners, in fee, of the real estate of which partition is sought, the same being a lot of ground in the town of Brookville. They were partners in business, and used, for purposes connected with then- partnership operations, a frame warehouse, which they had constructed on the lot. In July, 1846,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buchan v. SumnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
  2. Tippie v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Anderson v. TompkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1820
  4. Goodburn v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Needham v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Grissom v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Minter v. MinterOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Huston v. NeilIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Martin v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API