Roberts v. McCarty
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Franklin Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This was a complaint by Me Carty, Tyner, and Holland, against Roberts, for the partition of certain *17real estate. There was an answer by the defendant, to which the plaintiffs replied.
The facts disclosed by the pleadings and evidence are substantially the following: Stephen and Charles Coffin were the owners, in fee, of the real estate of which partition is sought, the same being a lot of ground in the town of Brookville. They were partners in business, and used, for purposes connected with then- partnership operations, a frame warehouse, which they had constructed on the lot. In July, 1846,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buchan v. SumnerNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- Tippie v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1913
- Anderson v. TompkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1820
- Goodburn v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1847
3Cited by9 opinions
- Needham v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Grissom v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Minter v. MinterOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Huston v. NeilIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Martin v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.