Legal Opinion

People v. Valencia

California Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2002No. S095385PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

Under California law, the crime of burglary is committed when a person “enters any . . . building,” including a “house,” “with intent to commit. . . larceny or any felony.” (Pen. Code,1 § 459, italics added; see § 460.)

We granted review to determine whether penetration into the area behind a window screen amounts to an entry of a building within the meaning of the *4burglary statute when the window itself is closed and is not penetrated. As we shall explain, we conclude that it does. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal, which held to the contrary.

I

The…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. ClairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. GauzeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. FaillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State v. PigquesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. Office of the Public Defender Ex Rel. MuqqddinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. HoltNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
  3. People v. SparksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Magness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API