People v. Sparks
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, C. J.
Section 459 of the Penal Code 1 provides, in part, that one who “enters any house, room, apartment, . . . store, ... or other building . . . with intent to commit. . . larceny or any felony is guilty of burglary.” (Italics added.) We granted review to address a conflict in Court of Appeal decisions concerning whether a defendant’s entry into a bedroom within a single-family house with the requisite intent can support a burglary conviction if that intent was formed only after the defendant’s entry into the house. We conclude that such an entry can support a burglary…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Mozzetti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. GauzeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. AbilezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. IslasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.