Legal Opinion

People v. Sparks

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2002No. S098290PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

Section 459 of the Penal Code 1 provides, in part, that one who “enters any house, room, apartment, . . . store, ... or other building . . . with intent to commit. . . larceny or any felony is guilty of burglary.” (Italics added.) We granted review to address a conflict in Court of Appeal decisions concerning whether a defendant’s entry into a bedroom within a single-family house with the requisite intent can support a burglary conviction if that intent was formed only after the defendant’s entry into the house. We conclude that such an entry can support a burglary…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. OsbandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mozzetti v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. GauzeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. AbilezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. American Financial Services Ass'n v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. IslasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API