Legal Opinion

Magness v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2012No. S194928PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LIU, J.

We granted review to decide whether a person standing in the driveway of a residence who uses a remote control to open a motorized garage door has entered the residence within the meaning of the burglary statute. For the reasons that follow, we hold that using a remote control to open a garage door does not constitute an entry into the residence. On these facts, defendant may be charged with attempted burglary, but he cannot be charged with a completed burglary.

I

Defendant Christopher Magness was charged in a felony complaint with attempted first degree burglary of an inhabited…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. GauzeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. NibleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. YarbroughCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. LujanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. Bedolla, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Yohner v. California Department of JusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. United States v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API