Wilber Development Corp. v. Les Rowland Constr., Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
This is an inverse condemnation action which the trial court dismissed on motions of the defendants for summary judgment.
The action was commenced by the owner of 61.3 acres of unplatted land in Steilacoom, Washington. The theory of the action, as settled upon after several pretrial conferences, was that the defendants, the Town of Steilacoom and County of Pierce, had, in approving plans for storm drainage facilities to be constructed by land developers in conjunction with subdivision plats of lands lying east of the plaintiff’s land, effected a taking or damaging of its property. The taking…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colella v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Meissner v. Simpson Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
- King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Laurelon Terrace, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Noyes v. CosselmanWashington Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
- Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Peterick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.