Legal Opinion

Teagle v. Fischer & Porter Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1977No. 44601PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

This appeal involves a products liability case in which we are asked to review the trial court's granting of partial summary judgment for the respondent (plaintiff). 1 The appeal also concerns the issue of comparative negligence under RCW 4.22.010 2 when the plaintiff's claim is based solely on the theory of strict liability.

The product involved herein is a flowrator, which was purchased by respondent's employer for the purpose of measuring liquids in the production of liquid chemical fertilizers for agricultural use. A flowrator consists of a metal body approximately 1 foot in length with a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. West v. Caterpillar Tractor Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Norwilton Murray v. Fairbanks Morse, Beloit Power Systems, Inc., in No. 78-2224. Cross Appeal of Norwilton Murray, in No. 78-2225Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Baughn v. Honda Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Dura Corp. v. HarnedAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Fahn v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API