Legal Opinion

Sanitary & Improvement District No. 75 v. City of Ralston

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1967No. 36503PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment determining that Wildewood Addition was not validly annexed to the city of Ralston, hereinafter referred to as city, and that the city did not become liable, for any indebtedness of Sanitary and Improvement District No. 75 of Douglas County, Nebraska, hereinafter referred to as district 75. City is a city of the second class, located in Douglas County, Nebraska.

During the early part of the year 1961, city was approached by developers of Fairview Heights and Wilde-wood Addition for voluntary annexation tO' city. Wilde-wood Addition was not continguous…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. May v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Sedlak v. DudaNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Moss v. City of FairburyNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Chappelear v. Grange & Farmers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Chappelear v. GRANGE & FARMERS INS. CO. OF BLAIR, NEB.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Foote Clinic, Inc. v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Campbell v. City of OgallalaNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API