Legal Opinion
Kacludis v. GTE Sprint Communications Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 1, 1992No. 92-2817PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS TO REMAND, TO AMEND REMOVAL NOTICE, AND DISMISS (12(b)(6))
CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Three motions are before the court. Plaintiff Dean S. Kacludis (“Kacludis”) moves for remand to state court for failure to plead jurisdiction adequately. Defendants GTE Sprint Communications Corp., Sprint/United Management Company, and Mohammed Z. Malik (“Defendants”) in turn seek leave to amend their notice of removal to cure the alleged defect. In addition, Defendants move to dismiss the third through ninth causes of action for failure to state a claim, pursuant to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Robert S. Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sanchez v. Lane Bryant, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Hernandez v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Prado v. Dart Container Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- David G. Faulk, et al. v. JELD-WEN, Inc., d/b/a Pozzi Window Company, et al.District Court, D. Alaska · 2026
- Efren Gonzales v. Team Industrial Services, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.