Legal Opinion

D'Avanzo v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 23, 2002No. 00-7761PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.

This tax refund action is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to remand to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Plaintiffs seek to recover an overpayment of money allegedly held by the United States acting through the IRS. Defendant argues that, as the United States Court of Federal Claims reviews tax refund suits de novo, the plaintiffs have the burden to prove that money is owed by the IRS. The defendant, therefore, opposes both the motion for summary judgment and the motion for remand. After consideration of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  4. Cook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  5. Sara Lee Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo & Co. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. W.E. Partners II, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Salem Financial, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Herrmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Lcm Energy Solutions v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API