Legal Opinion

Lcm Energy Solutions v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 27, 2016No. 12-321CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Section 1603 of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act; Determination of Cost Basis; Forfeiture of Fraudulent Claims Act; False Claims Act.

OPINION AND ORDER

THOMAS C. WHEELER, Judge

This ease arises under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (“ARRA”), a statute that Congress enacted in February 2009 to provide a fiscal stimulus to the nation’s ailing economy. Section 1603 of ARRA was designed to encourage the development of renewable energy systems. Pub. L. No. 111-5, Div. B, tit. I, § 1603, 123 Stat. 115, 364. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this case because ARRA is a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  3. Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  5. Scanner Technologies Corp. v. Icos Vision Systems Corporation N.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bishop Hill Energy LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  2. California Ridge Wind Energy LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Indiana Municipal Power Agency v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API