Legal Opinion

Herrmann v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 20, 2016No. 14-941TPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tax case; motion to compel deposition and document production from the government; motion to compel document production from a nonparty; motion by the nonparty for a protective order

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

Plaintiffs in this tax case, Jeffrey Herr-mann and Mina Gerowin Herrmann (the “Herrmanns”), seek a refund of income tax and interest paid in connection with receipt by Ms. Herrmann of $18,748,838 in the beginning of 2009 while she was resident in London working for Paulson Europe LLP (“PELLP”). The key question in the case is whether Ms. Herrmann received that payment as a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Herrmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  2. Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Herrmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. Mayo Clinic v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
  5. McGowan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API