W.E. Partners II, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Section 1603; Open-Loop Biomass Facility; Reimbursement Grant; Eligible Cost Basis; I.R.C. Sections 45, 48.
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
This case arises under Section 1603 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub.L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, 364 (“Section 1603”). Plaintiff W.E. Partners II, LLC (“WEP II”) funded the construction of an open-loop biomass facility in Lewiston, North Carolina next to a Perdue chicken rendering plant to which it provides steam. The facility was designed and now operates to meet Perdue’s steam needs for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gusc Energy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Nippon Paper Industries USA Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- ALTA WIND I OWNER LESSOR C v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.