Legal Opinion

W.E. Partners II, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 12, 2015No. 13-54PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Section 1603; Open-Loop Biomass Facility; Reimbursement Grant; Eligible Cost Basis; I.R.C. Sections 45, 48.

OPINION AND ORDER

WHEELER, Judge.

This case arises under Section 1603 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub.L. No. 111-5, 123 Stat. 115, 364 (“Section 1603”). Plaintiff W.E. Partners II, LLC (“WEP II”) funded the construction of an open-loop biomass facility in Lewiston, North Carolina next to a Perdue chicken rendering plant to which it provides steam. The facility was designed and now operates to meet Perdue’s steam needs for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gusc Energy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Nippon Paper Industries USA Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. ALTA WIND I OWNER LESSOR C v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  4. Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Ampersand Chowchilla Biomass, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API