Corey v. Hardison
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErviN, J.
The appeal raises this solitary question: Did Judge Friz-zelle err in adjudging the defendants not subject to punishment as for contempt %
The plaintiffs set the proceeding as for contempt in motion on the theory that the refusal of the defendants to surrender the public offices, records, and funds of the Town of Jamesville to Lilley, Blount, Coltrain, Davenport, Gurganus, and Hamilton runs counter to- this portion of the statute codified as G.S. 5-8 (1) : “Every court of record has power to punish as for contempt . . . any clerk, sheriff, register, solicitor, attorney, counselor, coroner,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- High v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Kimberlin v. State ex rel. TowIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- State ex rel. Davis v. OsborneArizona Supreme Court · 1912
- High v. . PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- People, Ex Rel. Smith v. . SchielleinNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kelly v. Village of GreenwoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Sisson v. FelkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Davis v. PageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Tucker v. State Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Pocoroba v. GregorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.